Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The 230 Headerfold project

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Some more thoughts:

    Making an intake is no different from the exhaust, and only three ports.

    You need heat to the intake on anything but WFO operation, like drag racing. Otherwise, the vaporisation of the fuel soaks up the heat, then can't vaporize anymore. You can't burn liquid gas. 5 mpg off road means you vaporise one gallon of gas in 12 minutes. Lots of coldness. Even stock heat risers heat the intake in the summer position. Maybe thin walled intakes will grab some of the heat given off by thin walled exhaust?

    From my experience installing headers in the early 80's, Tri-Y designs were for fit, not horsepower. Probably not pertinant to straight six engines, since they would take up more space than a tri-y on a v-8. You'd be talking six-to-three, then three to one. I'd guess that after all the work of building headers, you'll want to pitch that single exhaust system anyhow.

    Some of the tri-Y headers came apart in the two-tube section with a simple pair of flanges- 6 bolts required. I think there were different tail-sections for different chassis?

    My best luck with gaskets was two layers of the foil-backed stock ones.

    I've often wondered if the first step in designing headers ought to be firing it up with only an intake, in the dark. Pay attention to the exhaust flame direction, and build you pipes to keep that momentum going.

    Different body styles may require different designs, eh Norm? The set I did were for a 1/2t, 1941. Being a straight frame, not a drop center, and a single speed transfer case, there was plenty of clearance for the two mufflers next to each other, ovals vertical. Think a pair of turbo muffs, but I recall the Auger Powers were some slimmer. I think it would fit under the FFPW?

    I did 123-456 splits, with the output flanges in front of the bell housing- there was only enough space under the 'ears' for the two exhaust pipes. I'd guess 2 1/4". 123-456 fires every 120 degrees into each header.

    Building a high-rise intake gave me plenty of room for the head pipes to exit horizontaly from the block. That length gave me plenty of lee way to adjust the bends, to maintain somewhat equal length. Plus, it would help with room to gain access to the side covers. But you still won't want to try adjusting the valves while hot and running- feeler gauges and oily welding gloves don't mix well.

    Exhaust pipe was something called 'aluminum killed'. I always took that to mean it was alloyed to make it dead soft. Other tubes will be tougher to bend.

    On the 428 CJ in my F250, I made an aluminum water heated 'riser' under the carb. Think four 4" lengths of aluminum tube surrounded by a 6" dia piece of aluminum tube. Pipe fittings front and rear for heater hose connections. Longer tubes and water heat made it very smooth on the street. It would peg the chassis dyno at 200hp at only 2800 rpms. 11:1, Doug Thorley tri-y's, Ford C60Z-6250BB cam. I decided on the height of the riser by placing a beer can on the air cleaner and slamming the hood. A truly tuned intake would need runners four feet long. Same for exhaust. So headers are only free-flow designs at 3,000 rpms. Anyways, making a heated spacer for under the carb could be done on a drill press. Use a block of aluminum, and drill passages that cross, and plugging with pipe plugs. Lots of passages, lots of pipe plugs.

    Who needs cad/cam, or technical programs? Lessee what parameters are given: tube size is set by the ports, length by chassis, bends by how you have to cram all the spaghetti in there. Plus access to various maintenance requirements. But I guess reverse engineering the flange will help with getting it computer cut.

    If you have to use bigger tubing, port match the block with a die grinder. Steps are NFG, either way. To prove that to customers, I would have them blow through a straight spark plug boot. Then turn it around, and blow the other way. Just a little step in there. While you ain't no way ending up with a tuned exhaust, you do want to take advantage of whatever reversion you happen to find.

    I'm guessing that the 'bendable paper tubes' mentioned up-thread is like defroster duct? or the intake heat stove stuff? Interesting idea. Something else is nagging at the back of my head... pool hose? vinyl electrical conduit? vacuum cleaner? pretzel dough?... PVC tubing and a heat gun?

    Oh well, maybe I'll dive into a set for my FFPW...

    Comment


    • Hi Chris!
      The only thing I 'd add, and this doesn't pertain to I-6's, only V-8's, is that the Try-Y design was about 21% better on the dyno than the conventional long single tube headers.
      Harmonic scavenging, or just less turbulence ???

      Comment


      • nice!

        Chris,
        dang dude, that's one info-packed stream-of-consciousness style post! Awesome.
        So it sounds like you highly recommend some sort of heat riser. Makes sense although that would be difficult (but not impossible) to do with a typical header design. I plan to install an electric tank heater for those cold NH winters. Maybe I can make something using that principle, maybe something like a coolant-heated carb spacer similar to your F250 setup. Oh man, now the wheels are turning in my head again.....
        I fully realize whatever I make won't be "tuned" but I bet it will be a lot less restrictive than the stock setup and more durable too.
        I was told that I'd have to pair 1+6, 5+2 and 3+4 to get the best scavenging, but you say 1-2-3 and 4-5-6 works. That certainly would be easier to make and I think I'd have room for dual exhaust too.
        I still want to use SS pipe and I can easily anneal it to full soft for easier bending.
        15 minutes of measuring got me all the data I needed to quickly create a CAD file for the flange. I'd much rather have the CNC mill be making that while I scratch my head over spaghetti layout. I scored some free foam backer rod that's the same diameter as my pipes and I plan to run 1/8" welding rod down the middle to make prototype "pipes" that I can bend as needed and will hold their shape. I figured that'd be the easiest way to work it all out. I hope I can make each primary from a single length of pipe to minimize cutting and welding.

        Comment


        • MM;
          As far as heating the intake charge, you have two possibilties- heated intake air, or some type of "hot spot". The first would be easiest with headers- just weld an open stainless box with a fitting for corrugated tube to go to an enclosed air cleaner. the second might be possible with a Heat Pipe. A heat pipe is a tube with a wick and a fluid. The fluid boils off at the hot end and condenses at the cooler end. If the pipe is oriented so the hot end is above the cool end, no wick is necessary. They're extremely effective- in one test a 1" pipe moved an instananeous thermal power of 11,000 watts 36" with difference of 1 deg. A solid copper rod the same length & dia would have been hotter than the sun's surface at one end, and room temp at the other end under the same conditions. To dissipate the input effectively, it would have had to be 36" long and 9 feet in dia, weighng~ 40 tons.
          Last edited by maineSS; 12-27-2007, 02:38 PM. Reason: spelling

          Comment


          • Electronic pics of my Command Car:

            Anybody here have a hint on how to recover some photos on a floppy? That durn Sony Mavica has a well known problem with erasing the registry on the disc if you take a pic with a low battery. It's my only shot at getting to some old pics of the command car in question. The free downloaded program didn't help, and may have obliterated whatever was left...

            Otherwise, I sold the truck to "Dave in Dorris" waaaay north California. He's a friend of Maui Dave, maybe he can be tracked down to get some new pics? Maybe he scrapped the old headers. Maybe he would sell the truck back to me?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by maineSS View Post
              MM;
              If the pipe is oriented so the hot end is above the cool end, no wick is necessary.
              mSS,
              extremely interesting, I had not heard of these before so just did a bit or research. I read that if the hot end is down THEN you don't need a wick material since gravity brings the liquid back.
              Oddly enough I had thought of something similar, but was afraid that internal pressure would burst the pipe if temps got too hot. Would it be prudent to include some kind of check valve?
              It would be pretty simple to make a collar around some of the header pipes and run a heat pipe up to the elbow after the air cleaner.
              Better yet, what about a double system:
              1) fabricate a custom aluminum air cleaner elbow that has both windings of nichrome wire around it as well as a spiral of copper tubing.
              2) the nichrome wire is connected to a separate timer switch on the dash and only heats up for a few minutes before the engine is started to preheat the elbow a bit.
              3) when engine starts, the heat pipe system kicks in, scavenging heat from the headers and transferring it to the elbow.
              4) the idea is that the electric heat-up system would only be used in extreme cold to help heat air while the heat pipe system comes up to effective temps.

              I don't know how quickly a heat pipe system would get up to temp, maybe the electrical back-up isn't necessary.
              I am liking this idea more and more.....

              Comment


              • Originally posted by chriscase View Post
                Electronic pics of my Command Car:

                Anybody here have a hint on how to recover some photos on a floppy? That durn Sony Mavica has a well known problem with erasing the registry on the disc if you take a pic with a low battery. It's my only shot at getting to some old pics of the command car in question. The free downloaded program didn't help, and may have obliterated whatever was left...

                Otherwise, I sold the truck to "Dave in Dorris" waaaay north California. He's a friend of Maui Dave, maybe he can be tracked down to get some new pics? Maybe he scrapped the old headers. Maybe he would sell the truck back to me?
                Chris,
                bummer about the disk. Sorry, but I'm a Mac guy and they don't use registries. If there's an Apple Store near you and they actually have a Mac with a floppy drive (I haven't seen one in years) , they may be able to read it and pull off the data. Good luck.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by MoparNorm View Post
                  Hi Chris!
                  The only thing I 'd add, and this doesn't pertain to I-6's, only V-8's, is that the Try-Y design was about 21% better on the dyno than the conventional long single tube headers.
                  Harmonic scavenging, or just less turbulence ???
                  I would assume you are talking a 21% improvemnt over in my case 44% ? So, 21% of 44% is um 9% of the original 45hp?

                  Hmmm, I'd guess the biggest next restriction on the 230 would be the siamesed intake ports...

                  To bad there isn't an overhead valve head that would work on the 230... but I wonder if a slant six head would fit on a long block 251/265? Hmm, slant sixes are definitly NOT siamesed, but I wonder.... Anybody got two head gaskets to compare?

                  Comment


                  • Ha! The next biggest restriction is the design.....= )
                    I'd buy some of those living book tapes and just enjoy the slow journey.....= )

                    Comment


                    • tortoise

                      Slow works for me, not looking to make a dragster out of a 3.5 ton vehicle anyway. I just want reliable and durable (with a nice mellow throaty tone)

                      Comment


                      • MM;
                        Yes, I had the heat pipe orientation backwards- hot side is down for wickless application. The inside of the pipe has to be absolutely clean prior to the introduction of the fluid and final sealing, especially if the pipe is evacuated, as any outgassing of contaminates will block vapor transport. The working temp range is determined by the fluid's boiling point and the pressure it's under. If water is used at atmospheric pressure, the pipe starts working at 212 deg, if the pressure is increased or decreased, the working temp will change. On another note, I reviewed by % figures on Chris's intake/header dyno test, and found the increase to be~ 30.8%. The difference between 65 and 45 is 20 Hp, and dividing 20 by 65 = .30769 . As a check, 65 multiplied by .308 = 20hp which is the increase. A 44% increase would be 28.6 hp, subtracting this from 65 = 36.4, not 45. It would be interesting to see what rpm the test was run at as well as the model year of the 230, because the earlier versions were rated @ 95 hp at 3400 rpm on a 6.7:1 CR. By the mid-fifties, the CR was 7.25:1, hp was 103, and in 1958 a head design change in the valve pockets and another CR bump to 7.8:1 raised hp to 120. If Chris's 230 was 95 hp version, it would have lost 50 hp through the drivetrain at the original 45 rwhp- which is excessive. Generally quoted loss figures for mechanical trannys are 15-18%, and 5% for the rearend, or ~20-24% vs 53%. I haven't seen any figures for bias-ply tires or transfer case losses, but I doubt they'd add another 30+ percent. The increase in engine efficiency over the years would add up to a 21% increase, so it would be fun to run a chassis dyno test on your rig after intake/exhaust improvement, and see what it gains. From what I've heard, the 251 is a noticeable difference over the 230, and it was rated at 115-125 hp during its reign, so 120 hp sounds like the number to try for. Finally, a "hot spot" works better than intake air heating for vaporization, heat pipes work very quickly once their vaporization point is reached, but the best thing for power production is not to heat incoming air at all. I did some "cold vapor" experimentation on an Escort in the 80's and was able to get 60 MPG when everything worked (not often, with that system).
                        Last edited by maineSS; 12-28-2007, 02:44 PM. Reason: content

                        Comment


                        • 20 horse power is 44% of 45hp.

                          That is, 65 is a 44% INCREASE over 45.

                          45 would be a 30% DECREASE from 65.

                          Funny how math works, ain't it?


                          Monkey, is it too late for a 'before' dyno test? It looks like I am the only one here that has ever run a flat head on a dyno. Thanks, Paul, for the fringe benefits back then. Dyno, pipe bender, Mig....

                          Has anybody used a 'heat pipe' on an automotive engine? Seems to me we are we getting sidetracked from manifolding with a simple water heated spacer, like many cars use. Isn't a 'heat pipe' going to need jacketing to get some surface area at each end? Fine, the high-tech vapor/condense cycle is waaaaay efficient, but the point is NOT to make the inner fluid of the heat pipe hot, but to get heat to the incoming air. Simpler with a water heated riser.

                          Comment


                          • I don't know if this has been brought up yet, but 'Classic Tube' has pre-bent piping.
                            After you get your pattern made you could buy their tubing and just cut and weld. It's a lot cheaper than buying a mandrel bender for one set, expensive for mass producing but since I don't see this as being a large order product, it may work for you.

                            Classictube.com

                            Comment


                            • Stainless would be nice, but Jeez! About $400 for SS parts from Classic.

                              I used the typical 'crush bender' for the usual exhaust pipe. Like the cheapest headers are made. Obviously, it worked well. But did get crusty in time. Any pics I would have would have been after 20 years- you boys would lose all respect for me if you saw the state they were in 20 years after I made them. I think I had sprayed them once upon a time with gold header paint. Tacky, but functional.

                              ETA: I probably used 1 1/2" pipe. I doubt if I found 1 3/8" locally, or that we had dies for it. Tubing is by OD, which would make 1 1/2" 16ga tube 1 3/8 ID. How little are the ports in the block?

                              Maybe I'll eBay a hydraulic bender and go into business? Dyno Shop payed $2500 for theirs, used, in 1982. I wonder what Harbor Freight has?

                              ETA: I see Harbor freight has a 12t bender for $70. Anybody try one like that on exhaust pipe? Yaknow, the vertical hydraulic jack that you hand pump. It would only need to pump up a couple dozen 90 degree bends, if you didn't screw up any pipes...

                              Comment


                              • Harbor Freight is cheap, but they're all china crap, might last through one bend, might not.....
                                Look on epay for an old Greenlee conduit bender, they work great for nice clean bends and crank by hand (you can relate?)....= )

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X