It seems like there are two different fuel pump rocker arms on the 6 Cyl Dodge fuel pumps I've come across. I will try and attach two photos. I am wondering if one of them runs against the side of the cam and the other runs against the bottom? Are they interchangeable?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
6 Cylinder Flat Head Fuel Pumps
Collapse
X
-
My first thought is that they look too different with respect to lever geometry.
My second thought is I would think they would be interchangeable.
I would want to touch and hold them.
Are they both 230's? If they are, then I would think they must interchange.
We will get some other comments here, I am sure.Power Wagon Advertiser monthly magazine, editor & publisher.
Why is it that the inside of old truck cabs smell so good?
Comment
-
My Mechical Fuel Pumps
The top one is the original one, the bottom is what I went with.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb...type=3&theater
My truck is a 53, but my engine is a 43/44
Comment
-
Single Action Fuel Pumps
Both pumps pictured by Bruce look like they are single action. M37's had double action pumps to provide vacuum for the wipers.
So did many cars back then. I first drove flat head MOPARs in 1956. Through the years I found that pumps with the same part number on the boxes had the levers riding on different positions on the cam. The only thing I paid special attention to was being careful that the gasket was properly aligned since the lever riding position meant that the lever required different angles for insertion when mounting the pumps.
Comment
-
251 vs. 230 L6 fuel pump
I am amazed that as a group we can't resolve this! Seems to me that the 230 pump has the actuator rubbing on the side of the cam, diaphragm goes down to suck fuel in. 251 acutator rubs on bottom of cam, diaphragm goes up to suck fuel in. 230 valves are on top of the pump...251 valves are on the bottom of pump.
I guess my real concern is: are they interchangeable?
I've pulled 251 pumps off 230s and seen bad scoring on the actuator where it contacts the cam. Worrisome!
Comment
-
Since I started building high performance versions of the 230, I have stopped using mechanical fuel pumps altogether, and switched to gear-driven electrical units, mounted back near the fuel tank, just ahead of an in-line fuel filter. The main issue was too little clearance behind the forward exhaust header.
I have also replaced the mechanical pump in stock applications, eliminating vapor lock issues that can plague these pumps. I keep a spare pump on board, but have had no failures to date. Very clean installation, and replaceable in the field without messing with gaskets or working in hard to reach, hot locations.
This modification may not be desirable for those M-series applications that use the mechanical fuel pump to generate vacuum.
cd1949 B-1 PW (Gus)
1955 C-3 PW (Woodrow)
2001 Dodge 2500 (Dish...formerly Maney's Mopar)
1978 Suzuki GS1000EC (fulfills the need...the need for speed)
1954 Ford 860 tractor
1966 Chrysler LS 16 sailboat (as yet un-named)
UVA UVAM VIVENDO VARIA FITS
Comment
-
M-37 Fuel Pumps
My M37 quit this afternoon driving up a road. It would not start. I called AAA thinking I was out of Fuel (The Fuel Gage never gets off 1/4 tank). AAA came with 2 gallons. It still would not start. AAA called for a tow truck. I tried for 45 minutes to start it. No luck. The tow truck came, hauled it back to my house. The M37 started right up. I drove to the Gas station and put in 20 gallons. If it has a 28 gallon tank, it had 5 gallons when it quit. Was this a classic case of vapor lock? I'm reading about electric fuel pumps. I've see retro fit kits. Is this the way to go?
Comment
Comment