I just finished Firefighter 1 with a class of about 20 students, one being my 19 year old son, Samuel. This is the second time through for me as I had to drop out of the first class due to medical reasons (Rocky Mountain Spotted fever - don't recommend it) early last year.
Half of the class were highschoolers/college age kids (nice to see in in an area that has no paid firefighters). While they were all excited about being in the course (as most of us were) I noticed an interesting thing about the difference between the hands on knowledge and the book knowledge. For the mid term and final tests students had to get at least a 70. I was excited to see my son beat me by one point on his midterm (93 - yep. I'm bragging on him), but was appalled by how many of the students failed the test, or barely squeaked by with a 71 or 72. This was a multiple choice/true false test. A little over 1/4 of the class had to re-take the tests.
The problem with the ones that failed? They all refused to read the required chapters from the book before class. In each case they said if they couldn't learn what they needed in class they didn't think they should have to do homework. Two of the kids were were sons of department chiefs.
I'd blame it on age/experience, but several of the people who had trouble were close to my age. One of the firefighters had been serving as an interior firefighter in a company that had allowed him never to have to complete the training (mandatory in New York). He whined for the first half of the class "because I already know all of this sh*t". He kept it up until he almost failed the mid-term. His chief was one of the instructors. After that he shut up, dug in and did fine.
As I near fifty I see this less as an age related problem and a general problem in our culture. It's not new by any means, it just seems to be more prevalent today.
Half of the class were highschoolers/college age kids (nice to see in in an area that has no paid firefighters). While they were all excited about being in the course (as most of us were) I noticed an interesting thing about the difference between the hands on knowledge and the book knowledge. For the mid term and final tests students had to get at least a 70. I was excited to see my son beat me by one point on his midterm (93 - yep. I'm bragging on him), but was appalled by how many of the students failed the test, or barely squeaked by with a 71 or 72. This was a multiple choice/true false test. A little over 1/4 of the class had to re-take the tests.
The problem with the ones that failed? They all refused to read the required chapters from the book before class. In each case they said if they couldn't learn what they needed in class they didn't think they should have to do homework. Two of the kids were were sons of department chiefs.
I'd blame it on age/experience, but several of the people who had trouble were close to my age. One of the firefighters had been serving as an interior firefighter in a company that had allowed him never to have to complete the training (mandatory in New York). He whined for the first half of the class "because I already know all of this sh*t". He kept it up until he almost failed the mid-term. His chief was one of the instructors. After that he shut up, dug in and did fine.
As I near fifty I see this less as an age related problem and a general problem in our culture. It's not new by any means, it just seems to be more prevalent today.
Comment